Fresh debate has emerged over the 2026 West African Senior School Certificate Assessment results after an authorities of the West African Examinations Council raised allegations of technical problems and other irregularities in the conduct and processing of the assessment.
The issues were raised by Olanrewaju Fadehan, Head of Assessments at the WAEC workplace covering Anambra State, in a video that has actually circulated widely online.
Fadehan claimed that candidates who participated in the computer-based variation of the assessment were among those affected by the supposed problems, particularly throughout the processing and release of the results.
According to him, the problems ended up being noticeable around the duration when WAEC was anticipated to release the outcomes. He stated the outcomes were at first prepared for between August 3 and 5, 2026, keeping in mind that the assessment body had actually typically launched results on Mondays.
He alleged that the hold-up in launching the results was an indicator that some last-minute problems needed to be attended to.
Fadehan said the situation became apparent when the media awaited the outcomes on the anticipated date but the statement did not take place as anticipated.
He further declared that modifications made before the eventual release of the outcomes may have affected candidates who took the computer-based examination.
According to him, the alleged effect was particularly visible in topics such as Mathematics, English Language and Igbo.
The WAEC official also raised questions over the performance of some prospects in Igbo, especially those from the South-East, where the language is extensively spoken.
He revealed concern that some candidates from the area supposedly performed inadequately in the subject in spite of their familiarity with the language.
Concerns Over Financial Investment in CBT Facilities
Fadehan likewise drew attention to the financial investment made by schools that got ready for WAEC’s increasing use of computer-based testing.
He declared that some schools spent more than N60m on the facility of computer-based examination facilities in anticipation of the shift.
According to him, the circumstance has become particularly troubling for schools that invested heavily in the CBT system only to have concerns emerge over the efficiency of candidates who used the centers.
He argued that the development could discourage schools from making comparable financial investments in future educational technology efforts.
The authorities also declared that some prospects were not provided with appropriate calculators during the evaluation.
He claimed that the alleged failure to offer proper calculators affected students’ capability to respond to concerns in Mathematics and other topics requiring estimations.
Nevertheless, the allegations made by Fadehan have not been independently developed, and it stays unclear how extensive the reported problems were or whether they impacted the outcomes of candidates throughout the country.
Read likewise:
WAEC extends 2026 GCE registration deadline to August 28
How to access your 2026 WAEC certificate online
Authorities States He Reported Issues
Fadehan said he had actually raised issues about what he described as irregularities during the examination process and later on submitted problems to relevant authorities.
He declared that his complaints were directed to the WAEC Board, the House of Representatives Committee on Basic Education and Examining Bodies, along with the Minister of Education.
According to him, his actions were intended to accentuate problems that could affect the trustworthiness of the examination and the scholastic future of candidates.
He, nevertheless, declared that instead of having his concerns attended to, he faced disciplinary action and was subsequently placed on interdiction.
The official contacted President Bola Ahmed Tinubu to examine the scenarios surrounding the efficiency of prospects who participated in the computer-based variation of the evaluation.
He particularly prompted the government to analyze whether technical or administrative problems added to the reported bad outcomes.
Fadehan likewise made allegations of financial impropriety versus the management of the examination body.
His claims consisted of issues surrounding the supply of calculators, trainees’ identification cards and costs reportedly paid by candidates and other people looking for services from the examination body.
The claims have yet to be independently confirmed, and WAEC has not openly responded to the specific claims made by the official.
When called for a response, WAEC Head of Public Affairs Moyosola Adesina decreased to talk about the claims. She just stated, “No remark for now.”
WAEC Outcomes Currently Under Examination
The current accusations come amidst growing issues over the 2026 WASSCE results launched for school candidates.
Reports have emerged of school administrators and education supporters questioning some of the results, especially in relation to the expanded use of Computer-Based Screening.
Some school officials and education stakeholders have actually claimed that trainees who had previously shown strong academic performance received grades that appeared irregular with their records and arise from other standardised assessments.
The issues have actually sustained require greater transparency relating to how the 2026 results were processed and whether technical difficulties experienced throughout the CBT evaluation might have impacted candidates’ scores.
The advancement has actually also renewed conversations about the transition from conventional paper-based examinations to computer-based testing, especially as WAEC continues to expand using digital assessment systems.
While computer-based screening is anticipated to enhance efficiency, lower some types of evaluation malpractice and modernise evaluation, the concerns raised by stakeholders highlight the significance of making sure that prospects have equivalent access to practical devices, trusted systems and proper evaluation materials.
For thousands of Nigerian students whose admission prospects and future academic plans depend on their WASSCE outcomes, any unsettled questions about the integrity of the examination can be a severe concern.
The latest allegations have actually therefore put extra pressure on WAEC and relevant education authorities to offer clearness on the concerns surrounding the 2026 results.
As of the time of reporting, WAEC had not provided a detailed response to Fadehan’s claims. More information from the evaluation body and appropriate authorities will be important in identifying whether the reported glitches and irregularities occurred and, if so, whether they had any effect on prospects’ outcomes.